Econ. 511b Spring 1997 C. Sims
Note that this is material from a previous year's course, not the current one.

Note that Mid-Term Exams are graded and available in Room 6, 37 Hillhouse. Maximum score was 50, median 28. Scores 40 and above are good, below 30 problematic, and below 20 very worrisome. There should be a plotted cdf for the grades posted on the door to room 5 at 37 HH.

Answers to Final Exam  Final Exam

Answer to One Last Exercise (MS Word Version)

One last Exercise. (MS Word Version.) .

Dynamic Programming Exercise Answers. (MS Word Version) (The MS Word file is zipped. If you need the MS Word version and have difficulty with zipped files, let me know by email.) Answer is now complete. (4/22, 5PM)

Two-thirds term exam answers (MS Word Version)

Dynamic Programming Notes (These are in two pieces, dynprog and dynprog2. The link takes you to the course directory, where you pick out the files for yourself.)

Corrected Permanent Income Exercise (4/9/97 2PM) The corrections replace the exponential discounting terms with discrete ones and fix the equation of evolution for Y in problem 2 so that Y is lagged on the right-hand side. (.pdf version)

Change in Sticky Price Exercise: The 4th problem has no solution as stated. It should be modified to drop the L=1 assumption and add a term proportional to log (1-L) to the individual's single-period utility function. This makes labor supply elastic.

Answers to Sticky Price Exercise Complete answer, 3/30 1:45PM MS Word Version

Third Exercise due Wednesday, 3/5/97  (MS Word Version)

First Exercise  due Wednesday, 1/29/97 (MS Word Version)

Second Exercise due Wednesday, 2/13/97 (MS Word Version)

Notes on Price Level Determination and Answers to Second Exercise(MS Word Version)

Note:  Copies are socially costly, whether they are paid for or not and whether they are done on a laser printer or on a copying machine. Please do not download and print out on Statlab computers long (over, say, 3 pages) documents.  They have not yet started tracking and charging for printer usage. If people use their printers regularly for printing out long documents, they will no doubt start to charge or, worse for us, prevent transparent access to their printers. For the time being, it seems to be OK for registered economics students to print out course materials on public economics department computers.  And it is certainly OK to print out on your own printer, if you have one, any of the course materials written by me and linked to this page.

Course Outline and Reading List

Though this version of the reading list is much more complete than is predecessor, it is still not in final form. You will see that some references are still incomplete, and more may be added. You will not be expected to have mastered every article on this list for the exam, but in some cases the readings do contain material, beyond what was covered in lectures, for which you are responsible. I'll give you guidance on which readings are in this category before the mid-term. MS-Word version of reading list.

NTBHO=Notes to be handed out.

  1. Methods
  2. Dynamic Competitive Equilibrium. Consumption and Investment with Time-Varying Interest Rates.
  3. Price Determination
  4. Equilibrium with Non-Neutralities
    1. Barriers to Information Flow: Natural Rate Models
    2. Wages and Price Stickiness
      1. Overlapping Contracts
        • Calvo
        • Taylor
      2. Menu Costs with Monopolistic Competition
        • Blanchard and Fischer, Chapter 8.
        • Blanchard-Kiyotaki.
        • Caplin, Andrew S. and Daniel F. Spulber, "Menu Costs and the Neutra-lity of Money," Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (November 1987), 703-725. Reprinted in Mankiw and Romer, New Keynesian Economics, volume 1.
        • Rotemberg (82 RES? 83 AER? 87NBER?)
      3. Search
        • Pissarides, C. [1985], "Short Run Equilibrium Dynamics of Unemployment, Vacancies and Real Wages," AER 75, 676-690.
      4. Efficiency Wages
      5. Credit Channel Models
  5. Life Cycle Consumption
  6. Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium
    1. Complete markets vs. bond-only equilibrium.  Co-ordinating a firm with a representative agent; two representative agents. What is lost in linearization.